Medical Academy: Physician’s obligation to inform in aesthetic operations

“The legal dimension of medical intervention is not a subject of discussion in terms of interventions for the purpose of treatment, and the legal relationship between the physician and the patient in these interventions is interpreted as a contract of attorney. However, when it comes to aesthetic operations, the legal dimension of the intervention becomes debatable. It is accepted by the Court of Cassation that the legal relationship between the patient and the physician in such interventions, which are not intended for treatment, performed with aesthetic concerns and for beautification purposes, is not an agency contract, but a contract of work.”

You can access Av. Bahadırhan TABAK’s article published on the medical academy website from the link below:

He completed their bachelor's degree at Istanbul University Faculty of Law and their master's degree in Public Law at Çankaya University. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Medical Law at Medeniyet Üniversitesi. Starting his career as a judge, TABAK served in Elazığ and Ankara for a period of time. Most recently, while serving as a judge at the 15th Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, which acts as a higher court reviewing legal disputes arising from aesthetic operations, he resigned from the judiciary and transitioned to private practice. Currently, he is registered with the Istanbul Bar Association as an attorney and mediator, focusing primarily on Health Law in his legal practice. Click Here For Detailed Information

Leave a comment